Carnegie Corporation of New York established the Carnegie Commission on Preventing Deadly Conflict in May 1994 to address the looming threats to world peace of intergroup violence and to advance new ideas for the prevention and resolution of deadly conflict. The Commission is examining the principal causes of deadly ethnic, nationalist, and religious conflicts within and between states and the circumstances that foster or deter their outbreak. Taking a long-term, worldwide view of violent conflicts that are likely to emerge, it seeks to determine the functional requirements of an effective system for preventing mass violence and to identify the ways in which such a system could be implemented. The Commission is also looking at the strengths and weaknesses of various international entities in conflict prevention and considering ways in which international organizations might contribute toward developing an effective international system of nonviolent problem solving.
Commission publications fall into three categories: Reports of the Commission, Reports to the Commission, and Discussion Papers. Reports of the Commission have been endorsed by all Commissioners. Reports to the Commission are published as a service to scholars, practitioners, and the interested public. They have undergone peer review, but the views that they express are those of the author or authors, and Commission publication does not imply that those views are shared by the Commission as a whole or by individual Commissioners. Discussion papers are similar to Reports to the Commission but address issues that are more time-sensitive in nature.
Additional copies of this report may be obtained free of charge from the Commission's headquarters:
Carnegie Commission on Preventing Deadly Conflict
1779 Massachusetts Avenue, NW
Seventh Floor
Washington, DC 20036-2103
Phone: (202) 332-7900 Fax: (202) 332-1919
e-mail: pdc@carnegie.org
Copyright 1997 by Carnegie Corporation of New York.
All rights reserved.
What factors have contributed to the peaceful transition to majority rule, to true democracy, in South Africa? What lessons can other nations learn from the South African experience? Preliminary answers to these questions may be found in this report, the result of a June 1996 conference in Cape Town sponsored by the Carnegie Commission on Preventing Deadly Conflict, in cooperation with the University of Cape Town and the University of the Western Cape.
During my tenure as secretary of state in the Carter administration, we were committed to moving South Africa toward majority rule. We made it clear that friendly relations between the United States and South Africa depended on signs that such a transformation was beginning. At the time, guerrilla wars were raging in Rhodesia and Namibia, and we were intimately involved in the tortuous negotiations to resolve these conflicts and establish majority rule. We felt that it was essential for the United States and other concerned countries to offer the parties to these conflicts a credible alternative to armed struggle and to encourage the building of democratic institutions. We assumed, however, that establishing "one man, one vote" in South Africa would be a long and painful process.
The opportunity to end apartheid suddenly and decisively was one of those rare hinge points in history, and Nelson Mandela and F. W. de Klerk seized the opportunity. Together they turned South Africa away from conflict and toward democracy, and the result of their joint commitment to a peaceful transition to majority rule was the epoch-making election of April 1994, when South Africans of all colors went to the polls for the first time. The election, and the constitution that followed, reflect enlightened, consistent support for rights-based government, coalition politics, and civil society by Nelson Mandela and the African National Congress. But only the foundations of a peaceful democratic society have been laid. Building and maintaining a strong and enduring democracy on those foundations will depend on a continuing commitment by all segments of South Africa's diverse population to reconciliation and far-reaching economic and social transformation. It will depend on a healthy economy, confidence in the equitable administration of justice, and the willingness of those who were wronged under the old regime to put the good of the nation above their desire for vengeance. Other nations, the international business community, and nongovernmental organizations also have a role to play in nurturing the new and transformed elements of South Africa's civil society.
Just as the effort to end apartheid had effects far beyond South Africa's borders, so too will the effort to build a lasting democracy. I believe that the struggle to achieve multicultural democracy will be as important to world politics in the twenty-first century as the overthrow of apartheid has been at the end of the twentieth century. The Commission hopes that this report may shed fresh light on the process of transformation so that other nations can better understand and address the obstacles that lie ahead.
On behalf of the Commission I should like to acknowledge our gratitude to the University of Cape Town for providing the facilities and other assistance for the conference. We are especially grateful to Vice-Chancellor Dr. Mamphela Ramphele and to Ms. Helen Zille, director of Development and Public Affairs, for their administrative support and for their substantive contributions to our deliberations. We were also pleased to have the cosponsorship of the University of the Western Cape and the help of Vice-Rector Dr. Colin Bundy. Finally, I would like to thank my fellow commissioners, the Hon. Flora MacDonald and Sir Shridath Ramphal, for their participation in the meeting.
Cyrus R. Vance
Cochair